Baseball ignores alcohol abuse

My Dad and I were talking about this very topic last night. Baseball is more concerned with Barry Bonds breaking Aaron’s home run record than the major problems facing players (Hancock) and their managers (LaRussa).

Today, Murray Chass looks at the blind eye baseball has turned on alcohol abuse:

Alcohol last week killed one more major league baseball player than steroids ever have.

I repeat: Alcohol last week killed one more baseball player than steroids ever have.

Yet Major League Baseball and George J. Mitchell and Congress and the steroids zealots are in a tizzy over the use of performance-enhancing substances in baseball. At least Mitchell is being paid to care about them, but he is in such a frenzy to get to the core of steroid use that he wants to run roughshod over federal and state laws barring an employer’s release of an employee’s medical records.

Major League Baseball has made television commercials warning against the dangers of steroids, and dangerous though they may be for possible future ill effects, no baseball player is known to have died from using them. Ken Caminiti admitted using steroids, but he died at the age of 41 from a drug overdose that included cocaine but not steroids.

Baseball, however, doesn’t issue alcohol warnings. Baseball and beer have long been a revenue team, especially in St. Louis, where the Busch family’s influence is still large.

Putting steroids in perspective, since the Balco investigation began four years ago, 1.6 million people have died from smoking-related causes (400,000 a year, the United States surgeon general says) and about 150,000 (nearly half in traffic accidents) have died from alcohol-related causes.

How comforting it is to know that some people care more about baseball’s career home run record than the lives of hundreds of thousands of human beings.

Now, a few teams have banned beer in clubhouse in the wake of the Hancock death. Will teams begin to discipline players for alcohol abuse? Will they test for it?

100 juiced baseball players hide in fear

Drudge linked-to and ESPN posted an AP wire article entitled Court: Feds may use drug testing data from 2003

The names and urine samples of about 100 Major League Baseball players who tested positive for performance enhancing drugs three years ago can be used by government investigators in their probe of steroids in sports, a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday.

The Feds hope that Bonds name is on the list, but the real question is about the other 99 players. Who are they? Clemens and Pettitte? Palmeiro? Sosa? The legacy of those 100 will be tarnished forever when the names come out.

I really want Clemens to be steroid free, but who knows in this day and age. Our heroes often don’t look so heroic when you get to the end of the story anymore.

Steriod Investigation Sham

I am not buying any of your spin Commissioner Selig:

Selig brushed off criticism that Mitchell is too much of an insider for the job — Mitchell is a director of the Boston Red Sox and chairman of The Walt Disney Co., which owns ESPN — a national broadcaster of baseball and the network airing Barry Bonds’ new reality show.

Can you spell conflict of interest? I knew you could!

Even if the investigation is on the up and up, what is going to happen to players “caught” in this investigation? What happens with the juiced-players who already retired?